that company is often the object of litigation, but when a politician does a similar thing, his or her statements are dismissed as merely campaign rhetoric?
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
« Do diligence? | Main | The weather outside is frightful, »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8342040a653ef010536aa9934970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why is it that when a company advertises one thing and does another,:
The comments to this entry are closed.
I think its because people just expect that of politicians, but they refuse to expect it with companies. They refuse to expect it because they're being more direct with their money with a company, and with a politician it happens more "behind the scenes" as it were.
-Marc
Posted by: WealthNet Partners | December 05, 2009 at 10:16 PM